You are entitled to your opinion @Fruarse , but can you not agree that if ai at least detected patch points on the module graphics, you could implement an interface that would create a much more seamless experience in posting patch configurations? I fundamentally disagree with the Chinese Room theoretical premise. I personally believe it is not even possible to create such a room without somehow also in some sense copying the relevant structure from a human brain, thereby implying that 'the room understands Chinese'. I dont want to get into a philosophical debate about AI. I just think a certain usefulness threshold has been crossed, and would personally rather get an instant reply from Claude 3.7, than a reply 2 days later, from, say, @zacksname . If perhaps only the Haiku model was used, all accounts were limited to one use per day or week, and the right kind of data sharing toward mutual advancement deal could be struck, this could likely be implemented nearly free with very little impact. Etcetera.
I do not think it is possible to convince everyone to love our new AI overlords.
(Also, the gap width indicators are broken, because everything is not treated enough lile a state-machine.)
Peace. "✌️";
(edit)
I just think the whole community would be improved if little misunderstanding could be cleared up by AI, and the forum could be reserved for all the more "human" parts.
link:
https://www.noemamag.com/the-prospect-of-more-than-human-intelligence/
(Peace. "✌️";)
((edit edit))
Sorry I made an 'AI overlords' joke. Don't come at me modulargrid. Kidding. Peace.
(((edit edit edit)))
Yeah, ok. Maybe im just a bit frustrated. If you want to just ignore all my threads etc. then thats perfectly within your own free choice. I did not 'mean' to offend. Peace. ...